Since practicing in 2019, lawyer Wu Shaoling has focused on traffic accident cases, construction project disputes, sales contract disputes, and labor dispute disputes. She has successfully represented many major cases, including construction project contract disputes to recover more than 240 million yuan in project funds, and minors. The crime of fraud successfully sought probation and was awarded excellent legal aid cases, and effectively protected the rights and interests of the parties in contract disputes and traffic accident cases. She has provided legal counsel to a number of businesses. With solid legal foundation, rich practical experience and responsible and dedicated attitude, lawyer Wu provides professional and efficient legal services for clients, which has won wide acclaim.

2017.8-2018.4 Guangdong Guohui (Foshan) Law Firm Lawyer Assistant

2018.5-2023.8 Guangdong Yingshuang Law Firm

2023.9-2025.9 Guangdong Huashang (Foshan) Law Firm

Since 2025.11, Guangdong Zhiheng (Foshan) Law Firm

Huizhou University, Southwest University of Political Science and Law

Key lawyer of legal aid of Foshan City, member of rights protection service team of Women's Federation of Nanhai District of Foshan City, member of Chaozhou Association of Zhongshan City, member of legal work Committee, member of Chaoshan Chamber of Commerce of Foshan City

Key legal aid lawyer of Foshan City; member of the Women’s Federation Rights Protection Service Team of Nanhai District, Foshan City; member of the Chaozhou Association of Zhongshan City and a member of its Legal Affairs Committee; member of the Chaoshan Chamber of Commerce of Foshan City.

1. In cases where construction work remains unsettled and the current state of the site has been altered, we successfully secured full recovery of the project payment for our client.

Basic facts: More than ten years ago, Mr. Tang carried out construction work for a project commissioned by a certain village committee. Due to the villagers' disturbance, the work was suspended and the construction was delayed. Tang had to leave the site first. Subsequently, without terminating the contract, the village committee unilaterally removed Mr. Tang’s construction work and hired another construction team to carry out the work. After discovering this, Mr. Tang retained counsel to initiate legal proceedings.

Difficulties: 1. The contents of the completed construction have not been accepted and settled; 2. The project has been constructed by a third party, and it is impossible to identify the completed quantities of Tang. 3. Tang failed to complete the drawings and data retained until that year.

Solution: After the lawyer intervened, he communicated with the client many times, took over the client's project account number, found the necessary information related to the project involved in the massive project data, sorted out one by one, carefully studied and analyzed the contract terms of Shuangfa, and refuted the other party's opinions on the main body, project pricing, project quantity, project construction scope and duration in the second instance, the full support of the 1. Court of Second Instance.

2, contract disputes, break the shackles of settlement documents and some chat records, restore the real unit price, for the parties to reduce losses.

Basic situation: A garment manufacturing plant and a laundry facility have maintained a long-term cooperative relationship, with both parties communicating via WeChat. During this period, the owner of the laundry factory changed the unit price of the two laundry items from 7.8 yuan/piece to 9.8 yuan/piece during the communication between the two parties, and stated it on the delivery note. The laundry owner informs the garment factory owner each month of the monthly laundry volume and the total price. Settlement will be conducted at the end of the year. Subsequently, the laundry owner sued the garment factory owner to recover the outstanding payments.

Difficulty: The owner of the clothing store insisted on two unit prices, which were changed from 7.8 yuan/piece to 9.8 yuan/piece by the owner of the clothing store. However, in the chat record, the owner of the clothing factory did not raise any objection to the total monthly price. The delivery note stated that the unit price was 9.8 yuan/piece for 7 or 8 consecutive months.

Solution: After the attorney intervened, he reorganized all the chats between the two parties, the transaction habits of the two parties, and the evidence of the delivery note, etc., pointed out the contradictions one by one, and restored the unit price of the two parties, market conditions, etc. Finally, after two court hearings, the court found out and confirmed the fact that the unit price of both parties was 7.8 yuan/piece, and supported and adopted our reply.

3. In cases where product quality issues cannot be verified, the LED assembly plant shall bear the burden of proof to substantiate such claims.

Basic situation: Yanrong Company purchases LED light sources and their controllers from Yisite Company. This lamp is exported abroad. After the goods arrive at the customer's place, it is found that the LED light source controller of this product cannot display the power normally. The selling point of this product is that it can display the power of the product through the indicator light. After many times of communication, Yester Company was unable to solve the problem. Yanrong Company could only re-purchase LED light sources and controllers from other companies and re-install them for delivery to foreign customers. Some of the already assembled goods also cannot be sold. However, Yisite Company has been slow to resolve the issue.

Difficulties:(1) Because there are multiple accessories in LED lamps, it is impossible to intuitively see whether it is a battery problem, a solar circuit or a LED controller problem;

(2) The appraisal amount is as high as 70000 yuan, but the estimated amount of compensation awarded by the court is not high, and the client is unwilling to pay the appraisal fee;

Solution approach: In this case, the existing evidence from the chat logs is not sufficient to enable the court to determine with certainty that the issue lies with the LED controller. However, by examining the arguments presented by both parties during the trial, the attorney identified the central point of contention. The attorney through many times of communication with the client, and finally through experiments, notarization and other ways to complete our proof, refuting the other side of the problem is the client's use of the battery, solar circuit. The court, combined with the evidence of both parties and the burden of proof, finally recognized that if there is a problem with the quality of the other party's products, Yester will compensate for the quality of the products.

4. In a traffic accident case, the opposing party’s claims were entirely dismissed, and our counterclaim was successful.

Basic situation: Rui, due to brake failure when going downhill on the way to school, collided with the oncoming vehicle, causing damage to the oncoming vehicle and Rui was injured. Sue Rui to the vehicle for damages.

Difficulties: 1. In this case, Rui has the fault of pressing the line and driving a bicycle on a non-motor vehicle. 2. It is difficult to confirm the fault of the other vehicle, and the speed of the accident vehicle could not be measured at the scene.

Solution: The attorney, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, classified the liability of non-motorized vehicles and motorized vehicles. At the same time, in conjunction with the on-site surveillance footage, a maximum estimate of the vehicle’s speed is made. In accordance with the relevant provisions of laws and regulations, a counterclaim has been initiated in this case.

Ultimately, the court dismissed all of the opposing party’s claims. The court supports some of our claims.

5, traffic accident cases, the same responsibility, and are non-motor vehicles, the other party's litigation request from the 160000, derogated to the final 15000 yuan.

Basic facts: During their commute, Chen and Jiang collided. After review, the traffic police determined that both Chen and Jiang bear equal responsibility for the accident.

Difficulties: 1. The client is still not satisfied with the result of the accident, and the probability of changing the judgment in the first instance is small. 2. Many fees are subject to explicit legal provisions, making it relatively difficult to reduce or waive them.

Solution: 1. After the attorney intervened, he carefully studied and judged the evidence of both parties, raised objections to the relevance of the other party's injury and medical conditions, and applied for re-identification of the relevance and relevance ratio. 2. In response to Jiang's evidence, the attorney found that the other party had partially concealed facts from the village committee's certificate, social security records and salary flow, and defended them one by one. In the end, the plaintiff withdrew his unreasonable claim in concealing the facts, and the judge also rejected his unreasonable part of the claim, and the first instance ruled that Chen only had to pay 15000 yuan.