Lawyer Zhang Min has been working as a lawyer since 2018 and has successively practiced in well-known large domestic law firms such as Deheng Shenzhen and Kangda Shenzhen. His main business areas are civil and commercial dispute resolution, corporate legal business and administrative law business. He has solid professional skills and rich experience in litigation and non-litigation business. He is good at solving problems through diversified and compound legal means such as litigation, arbitration and non-litigation, provide customers with constructive solutions and effectively realize customer demands.

The practice style is rigorous and meticulous, calm and pragmatic, always adhere to the professional and responsible practice concept, undertake every legal affairs with a highly responsible attitude, strive to achieve the best solution in the case, and maximize the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of customers. Since the practice, it has won the recognition and trust of many customers by virtue of its professional performance and professional attitude.

2015-09-01 - 2018-06-30 Wuhan University, Master of Litigation Law

2011-09-01 - 2015-06-30 Jilin University, Bachelor of Laws

1. Participate in the case of a Shenzhen company v. a real estate company over a dispute over equity transfer (the target amount is 0.54 billion yuan, and the target property market valuation is 1 billion yuan), and promote the filing of a criminal case through the combination of civil and criminal punishment.

2. Acting for a listed real estate company to sue the project company and its partners for joint venture and cooperative development of real estate contracts (the bid amount is nearly 0.4 billion yuan), and won the case in an all-round way.

3. Acting for a high-tech company in Dongguan v. a state-owned enterprise in Hangzhou over a dispute over a sales contract (with a bid amount of more than 30 million yuan), involving a large amount of sluggish bank losses, making it difficult to prove, and finally obtaining a satisfactory victory result for the parties.

4. Acting as the defendant, a well-known electronic cigarette company and others, in the case of a dispute over liability for damaging the company's interests, the subject matter was 30 million yuan, and it also involved the return of public numbers and trademarks (more than 20 trademarks worth 30 million yuan). In the second instance, after Ma added a large amount of evidence against our parties, after negotiation and communication, a settlement was reached in the amount of 3 million yuan, and Ma withdrew the lawsuit.

5. Acting for a large commercial bank to respond to a contract dispute case of a village joint-stock company in the second instance, the facts of the case are complicated, the background time span is more than 20 years, and more than 10 related cases are involved. In the case of losing the case in the first instance, the second instance won the case in an all-round way.

6. Acting for a company to respond to Xue a Hong Kong OTC options trading dispute, through the clear characterization of the legal relationship and the analysis of the trading model, the court finally fully adopted our defense point of view, rejected all the plaintiff's claims.