1, labor arbitration cases: agent workers arbitration company, requiring the company to pay illegal dismissal compensation and other costs. In this case, the company terminated the labor contract on the grounds that the employee had caused losses to the company, pursuant to the company’s internal rules and regulations. After the agency case, through the study of the contents of the rules and regulations documents, combing the facts of the case, starting from the causal relationship, claiming that the company can not prove that the consequences of product loss are entirely caused by the workers, and put forward that the company's way of calculating the loss can not accurately reflect the actual amount of loss, thus not meeting the amount of loss stipulated in the rules and regulations. In the end, the Arbitration Commission adopted our claim and ruled that the company was liable for the illegal dismissal of employees. The subsequent first and second trials maintained the results and won nearly 300000 of the compensation for the workers.

2. Commercial arbitration case: The agent of the party's freight forwarding company applied to the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration, requiring the respondent to pay the arrears of freight, storage fees and other expenses. The respondent filed an anti-arbitration claim against us for the loss of the goods. The central issue in this case is which party’s fault caused the delay in transportation and the damage to the goods, and it also involves issues related to product packaging. Through sufficient analysis and demonstration, the declaration requirements and packaging requirements of different goods were distinguished, and the arbitrator was successfully allowed to determine that the relevant responsibilities of the case were borne by the other party, and the award supported all of our arbitration claims and rejected all of the respondent's anti-arbitration claims.

3. Dispute over private lending: The plaintiff claims that a private lending relationship exists between the parties and has submitted evidence such as records of debt collection requests and a loan agreement bearing the company’s official seal. I represent the defendant. After understanding the case, the two parties have an investment relationship and the transfer amount is the investment fund. Through collecting relevant evidence, I prove from the perspective of timeliness and logic that the company's official seal was at the plaintiff's place before a certain date, the plaintiff sealed the loan agreement with the official seal, and fabricated the chat record of dunning repayment in WeChat when holding the defendant's mobile phone, finally, the court adopted our claim in accordance with the principle of high probability, thus making a fair judgment and rejecting the plaintiff's claim.

4. Dispute over the mining machine service contract: the agent sued the other party, demanding to cancel the mining machine contract and refund more than 1 million yuan. The nature of the contract was quite controversial. We claimed that it was a service contract, and the other party claimed that it was a sales contract. Through discussing the main contents of the contract and the project operation mode, the judge finally adopted our claim, recognized it as a service contract, and ruled to confirm the breach of contract by the other party, request a refund of all contract payments.

5. Dispute over the Housing Purchase and Sales Contract: 63 owners sued Country Garden Company. Due to the quality problems of the house, the owners refused to accept the house and sued Country Garden Company for compensation and other expenses. By proving various problems in the house, Country Garden claimed that there was a breach of contract agreed in the contract. Finally, the court supported our request for compensation.

6. Divorce Dispute Case: Acting on behalf of the woman, suing the man for divorce, fighting for child support, and paying alimony. By collecting evidence of the breakdown of the relationship between the two parties, evidence of separation between the two parties, evidence that the woman is more suitable for raising the child, etc., she finally successfully won the child support, and successfully let the court decide that the man should pay the child support including the child support within a few years before the divorce to help to start a new life.