Lawyers

Experience

2016.11-2018.3 Guangdong Guanghe Law Firm

2018.4-2020.7 Beijing Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm

2020.8-2022.6 Guangdong Yuezhong Law Firm

2022.7-present Guangdong Zhiheng Law Firm

Education

Nanchang University

Affiliations

Beijing Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm 2018 "Excellent Assistant" Title

Beijing Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm Young Lawyers Training Class III Students

Guangdong Yuezhong Law Firm 2021 Outstanding Lawyer Title

Honors

Beijing Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm’s 2018 “Outstanding Assistant” Award

Trainee of the Third Session of the Young Lawyers’ Training Program at Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm, Beijing

Title of Outstanding Lawyer for 2021, Guangdong Yuezong Law Firm

Representative matters

1. Shenzhen XX Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen XX Tongfa Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Dongguan X Jin Precision Hardware Products Co., Ltd. and other financial leasing contract disputes, the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court ruled, all support our agent applicant's arbitration request.

2. Shenzhen XX Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. and Guangdong X Star Technology Co., Ltd. and the third party Shenzhen XX Tongfa Hardware Products Co., Ltd. executed the objection lawsuit. We acted as Shenzhen XX Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. and the first-instance judgment confirmed that the equipment was owned by us. No enforcement measures were allowed to be taken against the sealed-up equipment involved in the case.

3. The plaintiff Huang X Ju v. the defendant in the case of a dispute over the responsibility of the educational institution of a foreign language school in XX District of Shenzhen City. The plaintiff requested the defendant to pay the funeral expenses, death compensation and mental damage compensation totaling RMB 1208846.5 yuan. The first-instance judgment rejected the plaintiff's claim and we won the lawsuit on behalf of the defendant.

4. Cai X Can and Zheng X Biao are suspected of illegal business operation. We submitted a letter of opinion not to arrest to the procuratorate and actively communicated with the prosecutor. We believe that obtaining a tobacco monopoly retail license and engaging in tobacco wholesale does not meet the constitutive requirements of the crime of illegal business operation and should be handled by the competent department. The two suspects were finally released on bail pending trial.

Contact me

If you have a legal question or a matter for cooperation, please leave a message. Thank you.

Please complete the form carefully. We will not disclose this information to anyone outside the firm.