1999 Lake began working part-time in legal services

2005-2006 Full-time lawyer of Hubei Xiaoyang Law Firm

2006-2009 Full-time lawyer, partner, executive director and party branch secretary of Hubei Chuxing Law Firm

2009-2020 Full-time lawyer of Beijing Yingke (Shenzhen) Law Firm

2020-2022 Guangdong Yuezhong Law Firm full-time lawyer, senior partner.

2022-present Senior Partner of Guangdong Zhiheng Law Firm

Wuhan University

1. Acting as the defendant, Shenzhen Tianyi Investment Development Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Branch of China Xinda Chu Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Zhonghuantong Trading Co., Ltd. in a dispute over financial loan recourse (shareholder contribution), involving the target of 26 million yuan; The agency result of the case: Shenzhen Branch of China Xinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. withdrew the lawsuit against the defendant.

2. Acting plaintiff Zhu Yuling, Yichang Excellence Investment and Development Co., Ltd. and Yichang Gezhouba Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in the lawsuit and execution of the private loan dispute case, involving the target 0.15 billion yuan; The agency result of the case: about 0.11 billion yuan has been paid back.

3. Acting for the plaintiff Wang Xingmin and Yidu Tianxia Special Fishery Co., Ltd., Hubei Tianxia Sturgeon Industry Co., Ltd. and other private loan dispute litigation and execution, the case involves the target 28 million yuan; The agency result of the case: all executed.

4. Acting the plaintiff and Wang Yu, Zhou Yan, Wei Xueying and Yichang Excellence Land Construction Co., Ltd., the defendant Yichang Jiuding Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd., the defendant Yichang Gezhouba Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd., the defendant Yichang Panfeng Sightseeing Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., the defendant Wu Kexan and the defendant Hu Jiying in the lawsuit and execution of the dispute over private loans, involving the target 0.135 billion yuan; Agency Result of the case: About 0.1 billion yuan has been executed.

5. Acting as the plaintiff Tian Jialing Yichang Freud Commerce Co., Ltd., Yichang Hongjian New Materials Co., Ltd., Yu Hongzhi and Changyang North Latitude 30 Degree Tourism Development Co., Ltd. in the lawsuit and execution, the case involves 80 million yuan. The agency result of the case: more than 5600 million yuan has been paid back.

6. Acting as agents for the plaintiffs Meng Hua, Song Hongying, Henan Xinzhuo Real Estate Co., Ltd. and Cao Bisi in the lawsuit and execution of the private loan dispute case, involving the target 70 million yuan; The agency result of the case: more than 4000 million yuan has been paid back (in return for debts).

7. Acting as the plaintiff, Yichang Xiling Jiuzhou Taiyuan Microfinance Co., Ltd. and Yichang Mingda Mining Co., Ltd., Hubei Mingda Technology Co., Ltd., Yunnan Yongshan County Jinyinki Mining Co., Ltd., Shen Guida and Yang Guangju in the lawsuit and execution of the dispute over the private loan contract, involving the target 20 million yuan; The agency result of the case: more than 1800 million yuan (in property against debt) has been paid back.

8. The agency application executor Yi Bainian Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. and Yichang Hongjian New Materials Co., Ltd., Yichang Freud Commerce Co., Ltd., Yichang Hongxun Pipe Industry Co., Ltd., Changyang North Latitude 30 Degree Tourism Development Co., Ltd. and Yu Hongzhi Financial Leasing Contract Dispute Case, involving the target of 35 million yuan; Case agency result: over 800 million yuan has been paid back.

9. The agency application executor Hubei Pingping Investment Co., Ltd. (former creditor Yang Wenzhi) was executed by Yichang Freud Commerce Co., Ltd., Yichang Hongjian New Materials Co., Ltd., and Changyang North Latitude 30 Degree Tourism Development Co., Ltd. The private loan dispute case was executed, involving more than 3600 million yuan. The agency result of the case: more than 1400 million yuan has been paid back (including 1.2 million yuan in cash and more than 1300 million yuan in property).

10. Acting plaintiff Xu Jing v. Shanghai Minxue Zhijin Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Zhang Qingqing, Dingtai (Fujian) Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd., Shanghai Kefei Trading Co., Ltd. and Lin Weihua's private loan dispute lawsuit and execution, the subject matter involved is 5 million yuan. Case agency result: execution of 4.6 million yuan (cash).

11. Acting as the plaintiff, Jiuzhou Taiyuan Microfinance Co., Ltd., Xiling District, Yichang City, and Hubei Outlets Investment and Development Co., Ltd., Hubei Zhiyuan Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd., Zhang Bin and other private loan dispute cases, the subject matter involved is 10 million yuan. Case agency result: execution of 10 million yuan (cash).

12. Acting plaintiff Wang Wei and Hubei Outlets Investment and Development Co., Ltd., Hubei Zhiyuan Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd., Zhang Bin and other private loan dispute litigation and execution, the subject matter involved is 20 million yuan; Case agency result: 20 million yuan (cash) for execution.

13. Acting plaintiff Tian Jialin and Yichang Shengrui Real Estate Co., Ltd., Zhu Jiarong, Tu Jialan, Zhu Yuling, Zhu Jiaji, Zhu Jiayan, Li Jiangyi, Chen Xianyi, Zhai Guohua and other private loan dispute litigation and execution, the subject matter involved is 37 million yuan; Case agency result: over 1500 million yuan (cash) was paid back.

14. The plaintiff Tian Jialin and Yichang Tainuo Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Yu Shiwen, Meng Wenge, Guangshui Xinyuan Investment Co., Ltd., Guangshui Taikang Real Estate Co., Ltd. and other private loan dispute cases were litigated and executed, and the subject matter involved was 37 million yuan. Case agency result: over 1500 million yuan (cash) was paid back.

15. The plaintiff Wang Xingmin and the defendants Yidu Tianxia Special Fishery Co., Ltd., Lanze Bridge and other private loan dispute cases were litigated and executed, with the subject matter of the case being 18.5 million yuan. The agency result of the case: the execution of the refund is more than 2150 million yuan (debt in return, including interest of more than 300 million yuan).