Sun Yat-sen University

Personal profile: Lawyer Wu Bin is deeply involved in the field of criminal defense, especially the defense and research of economic crimes; he has obtained typical successful defense cases such as innocence of fraud, non-prosecution of fraud, change of fraud to false advertising, innocence of gambling in online casino cases, extortion, probation, bail pending trial, revocation of cases, light sentence, etc. -- Practice motto: "Do my best to help you fight for bail pending trial, non-prosecution, minor defense or innocent defense." Social Recognition: Guangzhou Lawyers Association, 2023 Theoretical Achievements Award. Type of Success Story:

1. Release on bail pending trial, decision not to prosecute, suspended sentence, acquittal;

2. A serious crime is reclassified as a lesser offense;

3. After admitting guilt and accepting punishment, the sentence may be further reduced;

4. Criminal prosecution; case successfully filed. Successful case of fraud:

1. In 2024, the case involving fraud related to “antique auctions” resulted in a decision not to prosecute.

2. From 2024 to 2025, there will be three successful cases of "health care products", of which two cases of fraud were commuted to the crime of false advertising, and one case of fraud was not guilty. Some classic successful cases have achieved favorable defense outcomes through effective legal representation:

1. In the case of He Moumou's health care product fraud, he directly fought for the first instance-the crime of fraud was changed to the crime of false advertising, and the sentence was changed from 11 years in prison to one year and 11 months;

2. The case of Dong Moumou's health care product fraud was sent back for retrial in the second instance; the first instance sent back for retrial won the crime of fraud to be changed to the crime of false advertising, and the sentence was changed from 11 years in prison to one year and 11 months;

3. In the health supplement fraud case, all defendants were found not guilty.

4. The crime of contract fraud involving “loan-investment” schemes,