As the lawyer representing the defendant's construction party, he once represented 2 major difficult construction cases with 12 million bid amount. Through careful study of the account flow, full investigation and supplement of favorable evidence and strict attack and defense strategies in the court trial, he guided the judge to deny the plaintiff's actual construction person's identity and finally successfully forced the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit due to insufficient evidence. In addition, in many cases of acting for the defendant, in the case of weak evidence of the parties, due to the accurate excavation of favorable defense points, the court finally rejected the plaintiff's application to close the case, so as to strive for the best interests of the parties.