After graduation in 2021, he entered Beijing Yingke Law Firm and transferred to Zhiheng (Kunming) Law Firm in September 2025.

Yunnan Police College

Attorney Jiang Juhong transferred to Zhiheng (Kunming) Law Firm in September 2025. Since working, he has personally participated in handling and representing more than 200 litigation cases of various types, is familiar with civil and commercial litigation dispute resolution procedures, has more litigation experience, adheres to honesty, abides by promises, and is good at formulating targeted litigation plans based on the evidence that clients can provide.

Since working, he has personally participated in handling and representing more than 200 litigation cases of various types, is familiar with civil and commercial litigation dispute resolution procedures, has more litigation experience, upholds honesty, abides by promises, and is good at formulating targeted litigation plans based on the evidence that clients can provide.

Case One

Acting for Huang xx v. Chen xx, Yunnan xx Road and Bridge Company and Yunnan xx Real Estate Company in the case of contract dispute, the 0.128 billion of the subject matter of the lawsuit, the defendant's important property was sealed up through litigation property preservation, which promoted the rapid mediation of the case, and the defendant of the subject matter of the lawsuit was fully assumed;

Case Two

Acting for Huang xx v. Li x in the case of loan contract dispute, the subject matter of the lawsuit is over 1400 million yuan. both the first and second instance of the case fully supported our lawsuit request. before the lawsuit, property preservation was taken to seal up the real estate under the defendant's name to ensure the subsequent execution of the case;

Case Three

Acting Yao x v Yao x, Yao x, Yao x and Qin x in the case of ownership confirmation dispute, acting as the plaintiff, winning the case in the first and second instance, successfully confirming the ownership of the two relocated houses and recovering more than 500,000 yuan in compensation for the relocation;

Case Four

Acting for He xx v. Zhao xx and Dong xx in a dispute over the right to life, body and health, acting for an 80-year-old plaintiff. After losing the case in the first instance, the case successfully fought for the second instance to be sent back for retrial. The retrial was revised in the first instance, and the retrial was maintained in the second instance, and finally won the case;

Case Five

Acting for Kunming X Investment Company v. Kunming xx Culture Communication Company in the case of contract dispute, acting for the defendant, successfully rejected the plaintiff's claim with an amount of more than 1100 million yuan, which greatly protected the rights and interests of the client;

Case Six

Acting for Yang xx v. Yang X in the case of property analysis dispute, acting for the plaintiff, and successfully dividing the real estate, deposits and debts in the litigation stage by preserving and sealing up the disputed property before the lawsuit, thus protecting the interests of the plaintiff to the greatest extent;

Case Seven

Acting for Zhejiang xx Decoration Company v. Kunming xx Real Estate Company in the case of construction contract dispute, acting for the plaintiff, organizing evidence to prove the purpose under the condition that the client provided less evidence, and the defendant who won the first instance did not appeal;

Case Eight

Acting Jiang xx v. Chongqing Construction Engineering xx Company for disputes over industrial injury insurance benefits, acting as an agent for workers, assisting in the identification of industrial injury and the appraisal of labor ability, winning the case and helping workers to recover all industrial injury insurance benefits;

Case Nine

Acting for xx Engineering Group Company v. Yunnan xx Project Management Company, xx Construction Engineering Company and xx Construction Engineering Yunnan Branch in the case of contract dispute, acting for the plaintiff in both the first and second instance, and successfully recovering the bid bond of 400000 yuan;

Case Ten

In the case of the crime of setting up a casino on behalf of Sun xx, the client was successfully released on bail pending trial in the investigation stage, and was changed to residential surveillance in the examination and prosecution stage. After reading the papers, the defender found that there was a loophole in the calculation method of illegal income. Finally, the public prosecution organ adopted the defense opinion of light crime and only sentenced the punishment according to the starting point of the sentence.