Lawyer Liu Sirui, graduated from Jinan University with a double bachelor's degree in law and finance, joined the legal industry in 2016 and has been deeply involved in the field of civil and commercial law for ten years. He has worked in the legal and intellectual property departments of large listed companies, and has served as party branch secretary, lawyer in charge and team sponsor lawyer of a comprehensive law firm. He has both practical experience in corporate legal affairs and professional practice ability of lawyers.

Focus on all kinds of civil and commercial litigation cases, good at all kinds of contract disputes, labor disputes, intellectual property rights and unfair competition, tort liability disputes, creditor's rights and debts, real estate and construction projects and other cases, since the practice of more than 600 cases, with rich litigation experience and case control ability. At the same time, it provides perennial legal advisory services for many companies, controls legal risks in business operations, and provides comprehensive legal support for corporate compliance operations, commercial negotiations, and dispute resolution.

2019-07-15 - 2024-01-22 Working in Guangdong Guohui (Guangzhou) Law Firm

• Independent undertaking of various civil and commercial litigation cases;

• Serve as corporate legal counsel and provide legal services;

Since December 2020, he has been the lawyer in charge of the litigation team of the legal advisory department of the law firm, and has been promoted to the lawyer in charge of the litigation dispute resolution department;

Since October 2021, he has served as the party branch secretary of the law firm and is responsible for the party building work of the law firm;

• Winning the 2020 Law Firm "Outstanding Young Lawyer Award" and "Outstanding Lawyer Team Award", the 2021 Law Firm "Outstanding Staff Award" and "Outstanding Young Lawyer Award".

2024-01-23 Working in Guangdong Zhiheng (Guangzhou) Law Firm

Up to now, individuals have independently undertaken more than 600 civil and commercial litigation cases during their practice, and have rich litigation experience. They are mainly good at intellectual property rights (mainly trademarks, copyrights, unfair competition), labor disputes, contract disputes, creditor's rights and debts, reputation infringement, franchising, house sale and lease, construction projects, decoration, private loans, adjacent relations, etc;

• Also serves as corporate legal counsel;

Operate personal WeChat public number and write and output professional legal popularization articles;

• Awarding the "Outstanding Young Lawyer Award" of the 2024 Law Firm ".

"Outstanding Young Lawyer Award" of Guangdong Zhiheng (Guangzhou) Law Firm in 2024"

He won the "Outstanding Employee Award" and "Outstanding Young Lawyer Award" of Guangdong Guohui (Guangzhou) Law Firm in 2021"

He won the "Outstanding Young Lawyer Award" and "Outstanding Lawyer Team Award" of Guangdong Guohui (Guangzhou) Law Firm in 2020"

1. A labor dispute between a unit and a worker: the worker requested to pay a total of more than 7.3 million yuan (including wages, commissions, year-end bonuses, reimbursement, double wage difference without a labor contract, and economic compensation) to the unit for arbitration. The agent party went through three stages of labor arbitration, first instance and second instance, from February 9, 2021 when the worker applied for arbitration to April 14, 2023 when the second instance was decided, and both parties litigated for more than 2 years. The final judgment in the second instance upheld only slightly over RMB 600,000, thereby reducing the entity’s losses by a total of more than RMB 6.7 million.

2. A technology company v. a packaging products company, a trading company, Li mou and other sales contract disputes: a technology company and a packaging products company have no dispute over creditor's rights and debts, but a packaging products company has actually closed down without property. in order to actually realize creditor's rights, additional actual controllers (non-registered shareholders, senior executives) and affiliated companies (no shareholding relationship) are the defendants, and the final judgment of the three defendants are jointly and severally liable for the company's debts, while achieving vertical and horizontal personality denial.

3. Series of Internet Tort Liability Disputes: Acting on behalf of the infringed to sue a number of reputation infringement cases, involving Internet platforms including WeChat Public Number, WeChat Circle of Friends, Microblog and Brief Book, all of which won the lawsuit. Many infringers bear the legal responsibility of stopping the infringement, apologizing and compensating for losses, and through enforcement, the infringed is allowed to issue an apology statement voluntarily.

4. A human resources company v. a security service company service contract dispute case: the difficulty lies in the fact that both parties did not renew the written service contract and there was a dispute over the service fee standard. Only the plaintiff and the defendant employee negotiated to raise the service fee standard in WeChat. Finally, the court found that the defendant employee's commitment to raise the service fee standard constituted job agency and supported the plaintiff's claim for 4.4 million yuan service fee and interest, and through the preservation of the successful full implementation in place.

5. Case of Li v. Eight Defendants for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition: As the defendant’s counsel in this case, I successfully mounted an effective defense. In response to the plaintiff's high claim of 6 million yuan and a number of trademark infringement and unfair competition allegations, we focus on the core issues such as the characterization of "trademark use", the determination of similar services and the calculation of compensation. The final judgment of the court only partially supported the plaintiff's claim, found that some trademark infringement was not established, and did not support the claim for punitive damages. The total amount of discretionary compensation was only 800000 yuan, which was far lower than the plaintiff's claim. After the second-instance appeal, the judgment was further revised to RMB 600,000.