1. Chen and others were charged with the crime of illegal business operation (Chen was charged with the crime of illegal business operation, and the amount of illegal foreign exchange trading involved was more than 0.2 billion yuan. After accepting the entrustment, the lawyer consulted the file in detail and submitted the relevant defense opinions against the parties to the court. Finally, the court adopted the opinion of the defender to give a lighter sentence to the parties and sentenced them to five years' imprisonment)

2. The case of Lou suspected of illegal business operation (Lou suspected of illegal business operation in tobacco case, the investigation organ was found to have illegally bought and sold tobacco with an amount of more than 500 million yuan. After accepting the entrustment, the lawyer actively learned about the case from the party concerned, determined that the amount calculation was wrong, and issued the legal opinion on Lou suspected of illegal business operation case to the case handling department and communicated the case with the case handling personnel, in the investigation stage, the amount of money involved was changed to more than 180000 yuan, and the examination and prosecution stage was changed to more than 60000 yuan. Finally, the court adopted the opinion of the defender and sentenced the party to a lighter sentence, sentenced to one year's imprisonment and suspended sentence.

3. A company is suspected of illegal business operation (a company is suspected of illegal business operation and is accused of involving a total amount of 0.18 billion yuan. The lawyer intervened at the stage of examination and prosecution. After detailed examination and communication with the handling personnel of the procuratorate, the lawyer believed that the case constituted a voluntary surrender of the unit and should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment. The procuratorate adopted the lawyer's opinion and finally the court gave a lighter or mitigated punishment to a lighter punishment to the company, A fine of more than 700,000)

4. Yu was convicted of accepting bribes (this case is a case in which the Guangdong Provincial people's Procuratorate protested to the Guangdong Provincial higher people's Court, and the Provincial High Court designated a local intermediate court for retrial. The provincial procuratorate believes that the parties in this case took bribes through low-cost house purchase and other forms during the period of serving as the leader of a municipal public security bureau. After the lawyer intervened, according to the facts of the case and the evidence of this case, the facts of the case were discussed from various angles such as the illegality of the evidence and the consistency of criminal law evaluation, and issued legal documents such as "Yu was convicted of bribery case cross-examination opinion", "Yu was convicted of bribery case, Yu's house purchase behavior does not constitute a defense of bribery crime" and other legal documents, and finally the retrial court adopted the lawyer's opinion and ruled to uphold the original judgment and reject the procuratorate's protest)

5. Zhang and others are suspected of fund-raising fraud, illegal absorption of public deposits, Guo and others are suspected of illegal absorption of public deposits (Guo is accused of illegal absorption of public deposits more than 3 billion, the case file has more than 700 volumes, the lawyer accepted After entrustment, the file was reviewed in detail, and the case was communicated with the procuratorate and the court in a timely manner, and the client was convicted and sentenced for a comprehensive defense, in the end, the court sentenced Guo to a lighter sentence of six years in prison)

6. Yuan and others were charged with the crime of producing and selling food that did not meet safety standards (this case was ten days before the procuratorate notified the client to be transferred to the court, and the client entrusted the lawyer to intervene in the defense. Through detailed examination, the lawyer found that the investigation organ had problems in determining the constitution of the crime in this case. The lawyer immediately drafted the "Legal Opinion on Yuan Mou's Crime of Producing and Selling Food That Does Not Meet Safety Standards" based on the case materials, and communicated with the host prosecutor in a timely manner, and finally the procuratorate did not prosecute the parties.)

7. Wen was charged with the crime of smuggling ordinary goods and articles (the court of first instance in this case found that Wen, the leader of a municipal public security bureau, evaded more than 1000 million yuan in taxes due to collecting fees from relevant parties, and was sentenced to three years and six months for smuggling ordinary goods and articles. after the parties appealed, the lawyer actively communicated with the provincial high court in this case, and issued the "legal opinion on Wen's acquittal", "application for bail pending trial in the case of Wen's conviction of smuggling ordinary goods", "specific opinions on the determination of facts, the acceptance of evidence and the application of law in the first instance judgment of Wen's crime of smuggling ordinary goods", "application for public hearing of the court of second instance", "on Wen's not constituting smuggling of ordinary goods and articles" the second instance of the crime defense "and other legal documents, in the end, the Guangdong Higher People's Court adopted the lawyer's opinion and sent the case back for retrial due to unclear facts and insufficient evidence)

8. The case of fraud of Sun and others (during the investigation stage of this case, the public security organ charged four charges of extortion, fraud, provocation, and illegal infringement of citizens' personal information, and transferred the prosecution to the procuratorial organ to charge extortion, infringement of citizens' personal information, and the crime of provocation and provocation, and the sentencing proposal is more than 22 years, This lawyer proposed illegal evidence to the court according to law, and issued the "Application for obtaining evidence materials", "opinions on cross-examination of the whole case of fraud of Sun and others" (47 pages), "defense of the first instance of the case of Sun and others charged with fraud, the crime of provoking trouble, and the crime of infringing upon citizens' personal information" and other legal documents, put forward legal opinions on the characterization of the crime of the whole case, and finally the court only found the crime of fraud and sentenced nine years and eight months)

9. Wang mou and others were convicted of the crime of opening a casino (after the judgment of the second instance came into effect, the parties entrusted the appeal to retry the case. this lawyer analyzed the determination of the nature of the case, the subjective determination of the relevant parties, the financial determination involved and other aspects, and filed a complaint with the court in accordance with the law.

10. A well suspected of endangering precious and endangered wild animals (this case involves more than 400 precious and endangered wild animals and their products, involving more than 30 people, and the amount involved exceeds 100 million yuan. During the investigation stage, this lawyer accepted the entrustment of Jing Mou, a party involved in this case. After in-depth communication with the client and verification of relevant evidence, he believed that the party involved in this case could not be investigated for criminal responsibility. Based on the situation of the parties and the facts of the case, this lawyer drafted the "Legal Opinion on the Case of Well Suspected of Endangering Precious and Endangered Wild Animals", and conducted in-depth communication with the investigators of the case. Later, the investigation organ of this case made a decision to release the bail pending trial and return the deposit, and did not investigate his criminal responsibility.)

11. Yu was convicted of accepting bribes and dereliction of duty in a state-owned institution (Yu, a party to this case, was a leader of a city's public institution, and the court of first and second instance found that Yu accepted bribes during his leadership and caused national losses of more than 300 million yuan. After accepting the client's entrustment to appeal, the lawyer consulted the case file for many times, and believed that there were problems in the jurisdiction, facts, evidence, etc. of the case, and made the ''Yu Mou does not constitute the crime of accepting bribes, the crime of dereliction of duty of state-owned public institutions, and should be acquitted. The "Criminal Appeal" filed a complaint with the Guangdong Provincial People's Procuratorate)

12. In the case of Yang crossing the country (border) illegally (the parties in this case entrusted this lawyer to intervene in the defense work when the procuratorial organ has pleaded guilty and will be transferred to the court for prosecution within 10 days. After the lawyer intervened in the work, he immediately carried out the reading work, believed that the sentencing proposal in this case was too heavy, and submitted the "legal opinion" to the procuratorial organ in a timely manner. After the procuratorial organ adopted the lawyer's opinion to plead guilty and punish the client again, the court finally adopted the opinion and sentenced Yang to criminal detention.)

13. Zhang organized and led pyramid selling activities (this case is a case of operating and speculating virtual currency suspected of organizing and leading pyramid selling activities. The family members of the parties entrusted this lawyer to intervene in criminal defense work at the second instance stage. The original court of first instance sentenced Zhang to six years' imprisonment and a fine of 800,000 for organizing and leading pyramid selling activities. After the lawyer intervened, he immediately carried out the examination work, believing that there was a problem in the conviction of the original court of first instance, and submitted the application for re identification and defense opinions to the court of second instance. The court of second instance adopted the defender's opinion and sent it back to the original court for retrial because of unclear facts and insufficient evidence. Later, the court of first instance adopted the defender's opinion and changed the crime of organizing and leading pyramid selling activities to the crime to the crime of illegal use of information network. And sentenced to one year and ten months, and a fine of 100,000.)

14. He Mou's case of producing and selling fake and inferior products (this case involves the identification of light circulating oil and counterfeit diesel oil. The family members of the parties entrusted this lawyer to intervene in the defense work in the second instance. The original court of first instance held that the amount involved in the production and sale of counterfeit diesel oil was more than 80 million yuan. After accepting the entrustment, the lawyer immediately carried out the work of marking the papers. He believed that there were problems in the facts and charges found in the original judgment of first instance, and applied to the court of second instance for re-identification and put forward defense opinions. The court of second instance sent it back for retrial because of unclear facts and insufficient evidence. At present, the case is still being processed.)

15. Li is suspected of fraud (this case was identified as a telecommunications network fraud case by the public security organs during the investigation stage, and the family members of the parties entrusted this lawyer to intervene in the defense work during the investigation stage. After many meetings, the lawyer learned about the facts of the case from the client, and believed that the client did not constitute a criminal offence, and submitted to the case-handling agency the ''Legal Opinion on a certain crime that does not constitute a crime of fraud, and it is recommended that your bureau revoke or change the compulsory measures in accordance with the law. The letter introduced the ins and outs of the case in detail, and stated that the party was actually the victim in this fraud case and did not constitute the crime. Finally, the investigation organ adopted the lawyer's opinion, acquitted the party and imposed administrative punishment).

16. The case in which He and others are charged with the crime of embezzlement of public funds.

17. The case of Zhou and others charged with the crime of fraud

18. Zhou Moumou and others were charged with the crime of provoking quarrels.

19. The case of Bai, who is charged with extortion.

20. Fan and others were charged with robbery, illegal possession, possession of guns, ammunition, concealment, concealment of criminal proceeds, and criminal proceeds.

21. Su and others were charged with the crime of embezzling, concealing and concealing the proceeds of crime and the proceeds of crime.

22. The case involving Bao and others, who are accused of the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards.

24. The case of Huang and others charged with the crime of operating a gambling house

25. Cen and others were charged with intentional injury causing death

26. Huang was charged with intentional injury causing death

27. Zhang was charged with the crime of causing death by negligence.

28. The case of Yang, who is accused of intentional injury resulting in grievous bodily harm.

29. The case in which Zheng and others are charged with the crime of kidnapping.

30. Case of Chen, who was charged with the crime of counterfeiting a registered trademark.

31. The case of Zheng, who is charged with the crime of endangering endangered wildlife.

32. Case of Jiang, who is accused of the crime of fraud

33. The case in which Yang is accused of the crime of concealing and intentionally destroying accounting vouchers, accounting books, and financial accounting reports.

34. The case in which Ma is accused of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits.

35. The case in which Liu and others are charged with robbery.

……