2021.01-Senior Legal Manager, Wind Control Center, 2023.05 Shimao Tiancheng Property Services Group Co., Ltd.

2018.07-Legal Manager, Legal Center, 2020.12 Aoyuan Healthy Life (Guangzhou) Group Co., Ltd.

2016.01-2018.07 Guangzhou Vanke Property Services Co., Ltd. Financial Management Department of Legal Director

2013.08-2015.12 Hunan Anren County People's Court Trial Management Office/Research Office

South China Normal University

In 2015, the key project of the Supreme People's Court "Socialization of Case Quality Evaluation" won the Excellence Award, the second prize at the 9th China Law Youth Forum, the third prize of the 8th China Trial Theory Research Association, and the "Trial Management" "A Preliminary Study on the Reform of the Third Party Evaluation Mechanism" won the second prize of "Youth and Reform Peer" essay solicitation by Hunan Provincial Court.

In 2015, the Supreme People’s Court’s key research project, “Socialization of Case Quality Assessment,” was awarded an Excellence Prize; at the Ninth China Young Legal Scholars Forum, it received a Second Prize; at the Eighth National Symposium on Judicial Theory Research, it was awarded a Third Prize; and the paper “A Preliminary Exploration of the Reform of Third-Party Review Mechanisms in Trial Management” was awarded a Second Prize in the Hunan Provincial Courts’ essay contest titled “Youth Walking Hand in Hand with Reform.”

Ning Moumou (Plaintiff) and Hunan Renwei Fengxinggong Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (Defendant) have a dispute over the pre-sale contract of commercial housing. They acted as the Plaintiff and retried and revised the judgment to support the Plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the contract and refund of the house price and mortgage.

The Central Washington Owners Committee (plaintiff) and Shaodong Xincheng Property Management Co., Ltd. (defendant) acted as the defendant in a property damage dispute, and ruled that the plaintiff's lawsuit was rejected.

Shanghai Aodu Cleaning Service Co., Ltd. (plaintiff) and Guangdong Field Property Management Co., Ltd. (defendant) have a property service contract dispute, acting for the defendant, and the second instance revised the judgment and revoked the first instance judgment. The defendant did not need to pay the service fee.